Backbunker saves New York woman from minor argument
TRIBECA PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER, NEW YORK, USA (September 26, 2025)—Backbunker, the revolutionary wearable entrenchment product from brilliant inventor Fredrik Bergström, has today demonstrated its effectiveness by protecting New York woman, Alison Fuller, 29, from an argumentative fellow shopper.
Ms Fuller said, “I was just doing my shopping, as normal, and then this woman comes up to me and starts shouting and pointing her finger in my face. It was terrifying. Thankfully, I was wearing my Backbunker. As the woman came to shove me, I pulled the cord and was soon behind three feet of reinforced concrete. I was safe until the mall security came to escort her away.”
Ms Fuller had purchased a limited edition of the Backbunker, the CAGE System (Compact Automated Garrison Enclosure), which deploys in a far stronger fortification than the standard retail version. Enhancements include a larger bunker size, enhanced electronics, including security cameras and electronic warfare countermeasures, an internal store of weapons and ammunition, and automated gun turrets.

Footage of Alison’s encounter has gone viral online. The CAGE system is shown deployed
On the CAGE system, Backbunker founder, Fredrik Bergström, said, “We only produced 1,000 units of the CAGE system, mostly due to the increased cost, but I’m glad that it served Ms Fuller well and did exactly what it was supposed to do. Crucially, the automated gun turrets were able to identify the gathering crowd as neutral and didn’t fire, unlike earlier models.”
Ms Fuller said, “In the heat of the moment I felt threatened by this woman. It was amazing how futile her shouting felt once I was inside the bunker.”
Backbunker are alerted when each product is deployed, and promptly sent a press team to capture the unfolding events. Ms Fuller was photographed inside the bunker after the incident.

Alison Fuller inside the Backbunker CAGE system
###
About Sunk Capital
Sunk Capital has been investing in world-class ideas for over 30 years. From our humble origins outside of a Kyrgyz jail in 1994, to the world’s largest and least profitable investment firm.
Our investment fund currently stands at $83 trillion, considerably larger than any of our “competitors”. The size of our fund comes through Barry’s accidental purchase of $25,920 worth of bitcoin in June 2010.
Since then, our investments have spanned the globe, and made Barry Sunk the world’s richest man in the process, owning 99% of Sunk Capital shares. We’re not sure who owns the remaining 1%.
For more information please contact us at info@sunk-capital.com.
Further information
For more information about Sunk Capital funds and our consistent portfolio volatility, please visit sunk-capital.com to obtain your official prospectus. Your investment objectives, the overwhelming risks, the unsustainable fees, the wide array of expenses, and other legally mandated information are all contained within; we implore you to read it carefully and soberly, if only to serve as a legal record of your poor judgment.
Sunk Capital ETF Shares are not redeemable with the issuing Fund other than in very large, needlessly impractical aggregations. Instead, investors must buy and sell Sunk Capital ETF Shares in a quasi-tertiary market, which will happily take a commission to facilitate your questionable decisions. In doing so, the investor will incur brokerage commissions and will frequently pay more than net asset value when buying and receive less than net asset value when selling. We believe this is an essential part of the Sunk Capital experience.
All investing with Sunk Capital is subject to risk and the near-certainty of total capital loss on invested funds.
Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss. It merely ensures that you can lose your money across a wider, more varied spectrum of our collective ventures.
Our bond funds are subject to the absolute certainty that an issuer will fail to make payments on time, and that bond prices will plummet because of rising interest rates, or, more likely, because the market has correctly perceived our issuer’s inability to make a single payment.
Our “high-yield” bonds are so named because they are generally in the final stages of collapse. They are therefore subject to an inordinate level of credit risk. We cannot be held liable for anything we say, do or imply. Ever.
Related news
A drop in the ocean: Splash brings joy to a vulnerable, elderly woman
Phyllis gives Splash, a North Atlantic right whale, a new home and the pair soon form a strong bond.
Chinese national goes missing days after bringing home marine predator, authorities baffled
In a case that has puzzled local authorities, Li Xin-y, 56, vanishes without a trace after bringing...
Dypvann’s zero-waste vision: offshore growth transforms concrete infrastructure into high-value biomass
A bold innovation in edible bio-waste, Dypvann's new food product, Viscous Marine Ooze, hits the she...



